//==-- SwiftCallingConv.h - Swift ABI lowering ------------------*- C++ -*-===// // // Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions. // See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information. // SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception // //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// // // Defines constants and types related to Swift ABI lowering. The same ABI // lowering applies to both sync and async functions. // //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// #ifndef LLVM_CLANG_CODEGEN_SWIFTCALLINGCONV_H #define LLVM_CLANG_CODEGEN_SWIFTCALLINGCONV_H #include "clang/AST/CanonicalType.h" #include "clang/AST/CharUnits.h" #include "clang/AST/Type.h" #include "llvm/Support/TrailingObjects.h" #include namespace llvm { class IntegerType; class Type; class StructType; class VectorType; } namespace clang { class FieldDecl; class ASTRecordLayout; namespace CodeGen { class ABIArgInfo; class CodeGenModule; class CGFunctionInfo; namespace swiftcall { class SwiftAggLowering { CodeGenModule &CGM; struct StorageEntry { CharUnits Begin; CharUnits End; llvm::Type *Type; CharUnits getWidth() const { return End - Begin; } }; SmallVector Entries; bool Finished = false; public: SwiftAggLowering(CodeGenModule &CGM) : CGM(CGM) {} void addOpaqueData(CharUnits begin, CharUnits end) { addEntry(nullptr, begin, end); } void addTypedData(QualType type, CharUnits begin); void addTypedData(const RecordDecl *record, CharUnits begin); void addTypedData(const RecordDecl *record, CharUnits begin, const ASTRecordLayout &layout); void addTypedData(llvm::Type *type, CharUnits begin); void addTypedData(llvm::Type *type, CharUnits begin, CharUnits end); void finish(); /// Does this lowering require passing any data? bool empty() const { assert(Finished && "didn't finish lowering before calling empty()"); return Entries.empty(); } /// According to the target Swift ABI, should a value with this lowering /// be passed indirectly? /// /// Note that this decision is based purely on the data layout of the /// value and does not consider whether the type is address-only, /// must be passed indirectly to match a function abstraction pattern, or /// anything else that is expected to be handled by high-level lowering. /// /// \param asReturnValue - if true, answer whether it should be passed /// indirectly as a return value; if false, answer whether it should be /// passed indirectly as an argument bool shouldPassIndirectly(bool asReturnValue) const; using EnumerationCallback = llvm::function_ref; /// Enumerate the expanded components of this type. /// /// The component types will always be legal vector, floating-point, /// integer, or pointer types. void enumerateComponents(EnumerationCallback callback) const; /// Return the types for a coerce-and-expand operation. /// /// The first type matches the memory layout of the data that's been /// added to this structure, including explicit [N x i8] arrays for any /// internal padding. /// /// The second type removes any internal padding members and, if only /// one element remains, is simply that element type. std::pair getCoerceAndExpandTypes() const; private: void addBitFieldData(const FieldDecl *field, CharUnits begin, uint64_t bitOffset); void addLegalTypedData(llvm::Type *type, CharUnits begin, CharUnits end); void addEntry(llvm::Type *type, CharUnits begin, CharUnits end); void splitVectorEntry(unsigned index); static bool shouldMergeEntries(const StorageEntry &first, const StorageEntry &second, CharUnits chunkSize); }; /// Should an aggregate which expands to the given type sequence /// be passed/returned indirectly under swiftcall? bool shouldPassIndirectly(CodeGenModule &CGM, ArrayRef types, bool asReturnValue); /// Return the maximum voluntary integer size for the current target. CharUnits getMaximumVoluntaryIntegerSize(CodeGenModule &CGM); /// Return the Swift CC's notion of the natural alignment of a type. CharUnits getNaturalAlignment(CodeGenModule &CGM, llvm::Type *type); /// Is the given integer type "legal" for Swift's perspective on the /// current platform? bool isLegalIntegerType(CodeGenModule &CGM, llvm::IntegerType *type); /// Is the given vector type "legal" for Swift's perspective on the /// current platform? bool isLegalVectorType(CodeGenModule &CGM, CharUnits vectorSize, llvm::VectorType *vectorTy); bool isLegalVectorType(CodeGenModule &CGM, CharUnits vectorSize, llvm::Type *eltTy, unsigned numElts); /// Minimally split a legal vector type. std::pair splitLegalVectorType(CodeGenModule &CGM, CharUnits vectorSize, llvm::VectorType *vectorTy); /// Turn a vector type in a sequence of legal component vector types. /// /// The caller may assume that the sum of the data sizes of the resulting /// types will equal the data size of the vector type. void legalizeVectorType(CodeGenModule &CGM, CharUnits vectorSize, llvm::VectorType *vectorTy, llvm::SmallVectorImpl &types); /// Is the given record type required to be passed and returned indirectly /// because of language restrictions? /// /// This considers *only* mandatory indirectness due to language restrictions, /// such as C++'s non-trivially-copyable types and Objective-C's __weak /// references. A record for which this returns true may still be passed /// indirectly for other reasons, such as being too large to fit in a /// reasonable number of registers. bool mustPassRecordIndirectly(CodeGenModule &CGM, const RecordDecl *record); /// Classify the rules for how to return a particular type. ABIArgInfo classifyReturnType(CodeGenModule &CGM, CanQualType type); /// Classify the rules for how to pass a particular type. ABIArgInfo classifyArgumentType(CodeGenModule &CGM, CanQualType type); /// Compute the ABI information of a swiftcall function. This is a /// private interface for Clang. void computeABIInfo(CodeGenModule &CGM, CGFunctionInfo &FI); /// Is swifterror lowered to a register by the target ABI? bool isSwiftErrorLoweredInRegister(CodeGenModule &CGM); } // end namespace swiftcall } // end namespace CodeGen } // end namespace clang #endif